Miguel Soto v. Rio Gary II, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20222:21-cv-02829California3,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-02829-ODW-MAA Document Filed 01/12/ Page 1 of Page ID #:113

O

3

7 United States District Court Central District of California

11 MIGUEL SOTO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02829-ODW (MAAx) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF

14 RIO GARY II, L.P., DEFAULT JUDGMENT [26], Defendants. SETTING ASIDE DEFENDANT’S

DEFAULT, AND GRANTING LEAVE

TO AMEND

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Miguel Soto applies for default judgment against Defendant Rio Garey 20 II, L.P. (“Rio Garey”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) at 21 a grocery store located at 2001 S. Garey Avenue in Pomona, California. (Appl. Default 22 J. (“Appl.” or “Application”), ECF No. 26.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court 23 DENIES Soto’s Application.1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Soto’s First Amended Complaint, filed June 28, 2021, sets forth the following 26 allegations. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 14.)

28 1 After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.