Candace Gomez v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:21-cv-06425California6,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06425-MWF-PD Document Filed 01/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:141

Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314) stephen@donigerlawfirm.com Scott Alan Burroughs (SBN 235718) scott@donigerlawfirm.com Kelsey M. Schultz (SBN 328159) kschultz@donigerlawfirm.com DONIGER / BURROUGHS 603 Rose Avenue Venice, California 90291 7 Telephone: (310) 590-1820 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Shanen R. Prout (Cal. SBN 236137) shanen@srplawyer.com

LAW OFFICE OF SHANEN R. PROUT

11400 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90064 13 Tel. (626) 590-1976 Fax: (310) 494-9382

Attorney for Defendant WALMART, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 CANDACE GOMEZ, doing business as Case No.: 2:21-cv-06425-MWF(PDx) “VampireKitten Productions,” an

individual, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

Plaintiff, 23 v. 24 WALMART, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and, DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:21-cv-06425-MWF-PD Document Filed 01/18/ Page 2 of Page ID #:142

1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.