Mary Starks v. County of Los Angeles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-05209-ODW-GJS Document Filed 01/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:381
O
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 MARY STARKS, individually and as Case № 2:21-cv-05209-ODW (GJSx) successor in interest to Decedent RICKIE
STARKS,
ORDER CONDITIONALLY
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
Plaintiff, MOTION TO STAY [14] AND DENYING AS MOOT v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [13] 17 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
18 Defendants. 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mary Starks, individually and as successor in interest to Decedent 22 Rickie Starks, brings this § 1983 action against Defendants County of Los Angeles 23 (“County”), Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Deputy Taylor Ingersoll, and Deputy Edwin 24 Barajas. Defendants now move to dismiss certain claims pursuant to Federal Rule of 25 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) and to stay the case. (Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 13; 26 Mot. Stay, ECF No. 14.) Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection 27 with…