Warden
Robert Darrell Johnson, Sr. v. Warden
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20225:22-cv-00099California2,559 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-00099-AB-KES Document Filed 01/20/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT DARRELL JOHNSON, Case No. 5:22-cv-00099-AB-KES
Petitioner,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v.
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE
WARDEN, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AS UNEXHAUSTED
Respondent.
I.
BACKGROUND
On January 1, 2022, Robert Darrell Johnson (“Petitioner”) constructively1
filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. 1 [“Petition”].) Petitioner appears to be challenging his
1 “Under the mailbox rule, a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing to the relevant court.” 24 Campbell v. Henry, 614 F.3d 1056, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); see also Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 268 (1988). A court generally deems a habeas petition filed on the day…