Warden

Robert Darrell Johnson, Sr. v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20225:22-cv-00099California2,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00099-AB-KES Document Filed 01/20/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT DARRELL JOHNSON, Case No. 5:22-cv-00099-AB-KES

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v.

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

WARDEN, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

AS UNEXHAUSTED

Respondent.

I.

BACKGROUND

On January 1, 2022, Robert Darrell Johnson (“Petitioner”) constructively1

filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. 1 [“Petition”].) Petitioner appears to be challenging his

1 “Under the mailbox rule, a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing to the relevant court.” 24 Campbell v. Henry, 614 F.3d 1056, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); see also Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 268 (1988). A court generally deems a habeas petition filed on the day…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.