Rose Ann Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20225:20-cv-01403California1,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

19 On July 16, 2020, Rose Ann Bryant (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a 20 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 seeking review of a decision by the 21 Commissioner of Social Security to deny benefits. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. 22 Plaintiff has not corresponded with the Court at all since filing the Complaint on July 23 16, 2020. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES this action, without 24 prejudice. 25 /// 26 /// 27 ///

II.

Case 5:20-cv-01403-DMG-MAR Document Filed 01/20/ Page 2 of Page ID #:937

BACKGROUND On July 16, 2020, Rose Ann Bryant (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 seeking review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security to deny benefits. Dkt. 1. On the same date, the Court issued an “Order Re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal” (“CMO”). Dkt. 6. The CMO stated: “Plaintiff will have 35 days from the filing of the answer to file and serve a Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Complaint.” Id. at 2 (emphasis in original). On March 16, 2021, Defendant filed an Answer. Dkt. 12. Accordingly, 10 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.