Bhopinder Dhillon v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

Case 2:20-cv-11661-DDP-GJS Document Filed 01/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:6941 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BHOPINDER DHILLON, ET AL., ) Case No. 2:20-CV-11661-DDP-GJS ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND v. ) COMPLAINT AND MODIFY THE ) SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD., ET ) RULE 16(b)(4)

AL., )

) [Dkt. 54] Defendants. ) ) ) )

P r e s e n t l y b e fore the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Modify the Scheduling Order Under Rule 16( b)(4). (Dkt. 54.) Having considered the

parties’ submissions, the court adopts the foll owing order. // /

/// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Case 2:20-cv-11661-DDP-GJS Document Filed 01/21/ Page 2 of Page ID #:6942

I. BACKGROUND

Bhopinder Dhillon, Reena Dhillon, Anita Pampalon, Richard Pampalon, Sangita Lal, Raj Lal, Jack Sekhon, and Praveena Giannoulis (collectively,…