Corey Fields v. R. C. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20222:19-cv-02549California1,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-02549-SVW-MAA Document Filed 01/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2546

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY FIELDS, Case No. 2:19-cv-02549-SVW (MAA)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

R.C. JOHNSON, Warden,

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file objections (ECF No. 33) is denied as moot. Moreover, for the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s objections are overruled. Petitioner objects that the California courts never gave a reasoned decision addressing his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the California courts should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.