Shahram Saba v. Maria Sinutko
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-00427-PA-PVC Document Filed 01/24/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAHRAM SABA, Case No. CV 22-0427 PA (PVCx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING
v. IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION MARIA SINUTKO, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly. 19 On January 20, 2022, Defendant, having been sued in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in California state court, filed a Notice of Removal of that action to this Court and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has denied Defendant’s IFP application under separate cover because the action was not properly removed. To prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court. 26 Simply stated, this action could not have been originally filed in federal court 28 …