Michael J. Banhagel v. FCA US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20228:21-cv-01730California1,598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1-2). This action concerns Plaintiff’s 2014 purchase of a Jeep Grand Cherokee manufactured or distributed by Defendant FCA US, LLC (“Defendant”). Compl. ¶ 9. Plaintiff alleges that the car developed defects during the warranty period requiring replacement and repair of various parts. Id. ¶ 11.

Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on April 20, 2021. On October 19, 2021, Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. Notice of Removal (Dkt. 1). Plaintiff filed this Case 8:21-cv-01730-DOC-DFM Document Filed 01/25/ Page 2 of Page ID #:813

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SA CV 21-01730-DOC-DFM Date: January 25, 2022 Page

Motion to Remand on December 1, 2021. Defendant filed its Opposition (“Opp’n”) on December 13, 2021 (Dkt. 16), and Plaintiff filed his Reply on December 20, 2021 (Dkt. 21).

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.