Tony Clark v. Todd Hoffman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20222:22-cv-00468California1,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00468-MCS-JPR Document Filed 01/26/ Pagelof3 Page ID#:

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY CLARK, CASE NUMBER:

10 CV 22-0468-MCS (JPRx) Plaintiff Vv. 13 || TODD HOFFMAN; DOES 1-10,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 |/ Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U\S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.