Clarence Warren v. J. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20222:20-cv-03572California320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-03572-DOC-SK Document Filed 01/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:140

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:20-cv-03572-DOC (SK) Date January 28, 2022 Title Clarence Warren v. J. Gastelo et al.

Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Under the Court’s Scheduling Order, the parties’ mandatory case status reports were due on Thursday, January 13, 2022. (ECF 54). But as of this order, Plaintiff has filed no timely case status report as ordered. Only Defendants have filed theirs. (ECF 55). The case status report is not an empty document; it is an indispensable tool in assessing how Plaintiff intends to prosecute the case and provides the Court with the necessary information needed to schedule court proceedings aimed at a merits disposition. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.