Ritchie-Franklin
Ritchie-Franklin v. Larson CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
Ritchie-Franklin is representing herself on appeal. The record on appeal does not
include any pleadings, plaintiff’s request for entry of default, or the default judgment
entered against Larson. Our summary of the factual and procedural history is drawn from
the limited documents provided in the record, including the superior court’s register of
actions.
According to the register of actions, Ritchie-Franklin filed a complaint in August
2018 and a first amended complaint in January 2019. Ritchie-Franklin filed several
proofs of service purporting to show that Larson was served with both the complaint and
the first amended complaint. The proofs of service are not included in the record on
appeal. Each of those proofs of service is listed in the docket as being “non-complaint
[sic].”
Starting in January 2021, Ritchie-Franklin filed several documents whose titles
suggest that she was moving for entry of default judgment against Larson. The court
entered judgment against Larson on August 27, 2021, and notice of entry of judgment
was filed about two weeks later. The docket does not include entries for separately filed
proofs of service for either of those…