Stephen H. Bafford v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20222:18-cv-10219California5,746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:18-cv-10219-ODW-E Document 100 Filed 02/01/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2664

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

11 STEPHEN H. BAFFORD, et al., Case № 2:18-cv-10219-ODW (Ex)

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING v. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE’S

MOTION TO DISMISS [84] AND

NORTHROP GRUMMAN DEFERRING RULING ON ALIGHT’S

15 CORPORATION, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [85]; CONDITIONAL ORDER TO SHOW Defendants. CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION

18 I. INTRODUCTION In this case, Plaintiffs Stephen H. Bafford, Laura Bafford, and Evelyn L. Wilson 21 bring a putative class action against Defendants Northrop Grumman Corporation; 22 Administrative Committee of the Northrop Grumman Pension Plan; and Alight 23 Solutions LLC for damages arising from miscalculation of Plaintiffs’ retirement 24 benefits. The operative Second Amended Complaint, filed August 13, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.