Tin Quoc Phan v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20228:22-cv-00105California6,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-00105-SB-PLA Document Filed 02/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 TIN QUOC PHAN, ) No. SA CV 22-105-SB (PLA) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH v. ) LEAVE TO AMEND ) COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On January 21, 2022, plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff did not prepay the filing fees and instead submitted a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 2, 4). In his Complaint, plaintiff names as defendants the County of Orange (ECF No. 1 at 2; “County”); Loretta Lopez, a Senior Social Worker in the County (id. at 2); and Lauri Luchonok, a Senior Social Worker in the County (id. at 3). The two individual defendants are named in their official capacities only. (Id. at 2-3). In the portion of the Complaint for plaintiff to state the legal basis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.