Feridoon Aslani v. San Bernardino County

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20225:21-cv-01333California637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01333-ODW-ADS Document Filed 02/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 FERIDOON ASLANI, Case No. 5:21-01333 ODW (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, et al., RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the record in this case. After engaging in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made, the Court overrules Plaintiff’s objections. In his unsworn objections, Plaintiff explains for the first time why he failed to respond to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth’s prior orders and why he needs more time to file a First Amended Complaint. First, Plaintiff explains that he has developed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.