Belinda C. Muhammad v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:19-cv-07970California607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-07970-JAK-PVC Document 102 Filed 02/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:970

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BELINDA C. MUHAMMAD, Case No. CV 19-7970 JAK (PVC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

BRETANNIYIA JENKINS, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Fourth Amended Complaint, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Adjudication, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 24 In her Objections, Plaintiff maintains that proper application of the sham affidavit rule requires that her Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.