Oakwood Worldwide v. Latrell Johnson
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20222:22-cv-00783California899 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-00783-CAS-PLA Document Filed 02/07/ Page1lof3 Page ID #:
l JS-6 3 5 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKWOOD WORLDWIDE, CASE NUMBER:
10 CV 22-783-CAS (PLAx) Plaintiff v. || LATRELL JOHNSON,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT Is Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. lly. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, 23 || those statutes are…