Kent Sachs v. Pankow Operating, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20222:21-cv-08998California3,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-08998-AB-ADS Document Filed 02/16/ Page 1 of Page ID #:275

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 KENT SACHS, individually, and on behalf of other aggrieved employees, pursuant to the California Private Case No.: 2:21-cv-08998-AB (ADSx) 14 Attorneys General Act; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE

COURT

v.

18 PANKOW OPERATING, INC., a California corporation; CHARLES PANKOW BUILDERS, LTD., a 20 California limited partnership; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 22 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Kent Sachs’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 16). Defendants Pankow Operating, Inc. and Charles Pankow Builders, Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Pankow”) opposed the Motion (“Opp’n”), (Dkt. No. 20), and Plaintiff filed a Reply

1 . Case 2:21-cv-08998-AB-ADS Document Filed 02/16/ Page 2 of Page ID #:276

(“Reply”), (Dkt. No. 21). The Court deemed this matter appropriate for resolution without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.