Steve Saray v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20225:20-cv-02460California1,378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:20-cv-02460-MCS-SHK Document Filed 02/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:106

1 2 3 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 STEVE SARAY, Case No. 5:20-cv-02460-MCS-SHK Plaintiff, v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

For the following reasons, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On November 29, 2021, the Court issued its Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) and Notice of Filing of Report and Recommendation (“R&R Notice”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 18, R&R; ECF No. 19, R&R Notice. On December 10, 2021, the R&R and R&R Notice were returned to the Court as undeliverable with a notation that Plaintiff Steve Saray (“Plaintiff”) was “paroled/discharged.” ECF No. 20, Returned R&R at 1 (capitalization normalized); ECF No. 21, Returned R&R Notice at 1 (capitalization normalized). Based on the returned mail, the Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to properly inform…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.