Crystal Redick v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20222:21-cv-06578California3,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06578-PA-KK Document Filed 02/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:167

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 CRYSTAL REDICK, Case No. 2:21-CV-06578-PA-KK 12 Plaintiff,

CONSENT DECREE

13 v.

ORLANDO BATHING SUIT, LLC,

et al., Defendants. 17 This Consent Decree is entered into as of the Effective Date (defined below) 19 by and between Plaintiff Crystal Redick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Orlando Bathing 20 Suit, LLC d/b/a Everything But Water (“Defendant”). Plaintiff and Defendant shall 21 hereinafter be referred to collectively as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party”

RECITALS

24 1. Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (as amended, the 25 “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, and its implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. pt. 27 36, prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment 28 -1 -

CONSENT DECREE

KC 17895547.

Case 2:21-cv-06578-PA-KK Document Filed 02/21/ Page 2 of Page ID #:168

EXHIBIT A

of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.