Crystal Redick v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20222:21-cv-06578California3,391 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-06578-PA-KK Document Filed 02/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:167
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 CRYSTAL REDICK, Case No. 2:21-CV-06578-PA-KK 12 Plaintiff,
CONSENT DECREE
13 v.
ORLANDO BATHING SUIT, LLC,
et al., Defendants. 17 This Consent Decree is entered into as of the Effective Date (defined below) 19 by and between Plaintiff Crystal Redick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Orlando Bathing 20 Suit, LLC d/b/a Everything But Water (“Defendant”). Plaintiff and Defendant shall 21 hereinafter be referred to collectively as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party”
RECITALS
24 1. Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (as amended, the 25 “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, and its implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. pt. 27 36, prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment 28 -1 -
CONSENT DECREE
KC 17895547.
Case 2:21-cv-06578-PA-KK Document Filed 02/21/ Page 2 of Page ID #:168
EXHIBIT A
of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or…