Shankel Patel v. Giselle Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20222:20-cv-09126California1,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-09126-SB-MAA Document Filed 02/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:7397

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANKER PATEL, Case No. 2:20-cv-09126-SB-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

GISSELLE MATTESON, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 28), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 33). The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s January 28, 2022 objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 34.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. Petitioner argues for the first time in his Objections that his claim for relief in Ground K of the Proposed Amended Petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.