Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20222:22-cv-00929California3,774 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-00929-FMO-PVC Document Filed 02/22/ Page1lof1i0 Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. _CV_ 22-0929 FMO (PVCx) Date: February 22, 2022 Title Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM (DKt. No. 2) On February 9, 2022, Plaintiff Eric Malone, a Pennsylvania resident proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendant Toyota Motor Sales seeking enforcement of an alleged arbitration award. (“Compl.,” Dkt. No. 1).' Simultaneously with the Complaint, Plaintiff filed the instant request to proceed in forma pauperis. …