Stusa Holdings v. Ford Motor Company
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20225:21-cv-02172California822 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:21-cv-02172-SVW-SHK Document Filed 02/22/ Page1of2 Page ID #:156
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. 5:21-cv-02172-SVW-SHK Date February 22, 2022
Title Stusa Holdings et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Paul M. Cruz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:
N/A N/A
Proceedings: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND [8] Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. See ECF No. 8. Remand may be granted for a defect in the removal procedure or for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1), a notice of removal must be filed within 30 days of receiving the initial pleading. Ifthe initial pleading does not establish removability, another 30-day removal period is triggered upon receiving “a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper.” See 28 U.S.C. §…