Patricia Ann Doyle v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20228:20-cv-01917California6,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:20-cv-01917-GJS Document Filed 02/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1602

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA D.,

Case No. 8:20-cv-01917-GJS Plaintiff 12 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ORDER Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Patricia D. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 21 and 27] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 24 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), Dkt. 29 (“Def. Br.”)], and Dkt. 30 (“Pltf.’s Reply”).] The matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be affirmed. 27 In the interest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.