Priscilla Luna v. P and M Healthcare Holdings
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20225:22-cv-00300California384 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-00300-SB-SHK Document Filed 02/24/ Page 1 of Page ID #:495
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 5:22-cv-00300-SB-SHK Date: February 23, 2022
Priscilla Luna et al. v. P & M Healthcare Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Rancho Mesa Title: Care Center et al.
Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge
Jennifer Graciano N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing None Appearing
Proceedings: AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED
On February 18, 2022, the Court issued an order to show cause (OSC) why this matter should not be remanded to state court in light of the reasoning in two decisions by this Court addressing similar questions of federal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 10.
On February 22, 2022, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 2022 WL 518989 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022), a case with striking similarities to this one. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the…