Priscilla Luna v. P and M Healthcare Holdings

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20225:22-cv-00300California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00300-SB-SHK Document Filed 02/24/ Page 1 of Page ID #:495

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 5:22-cv-00300-SB-SHK Date: February 23, 2022

Priscilla Luna et al. v. P & M Healthcare Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Rancho Mesa Title: Care Center et al.

Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge

Jennifer Graciano N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE

SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED

On February 18, 2022, the Court issued an order to show cause (OSC) why this matter should not be remanded to state court in light of the reasoning in two decisions by this Court addressing similar questions of federal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 10.

On February 22, 2022, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 2022 WL 518989 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2022), a case with striking similarities to this one. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.