Omar Rosales v. The Kroger Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20228:21-cv-00796California4,770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-00796-JLS-KES Document Filed 03/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:379

David Mara, Esq. (230498) 1 Jill Vecchi, Esq. (299333)

MARA LAW FIRM, PC

2 2650 Camino Del Rio North Suite 205 San Diego, California 92108 3 Telephone: (619) 234-2833 Facsimile: (619) 234-4048 4 Mohamed Eldessouky, Esq. (SBN: 289955) 5 ELDESSOUKY LAW 17139 Bellflower Blvd, Suite 202 6 Bellflower, California 92808 Telephone: (562) 461-0995 7 Facsimile: (562) 461-0998

8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Omar Rosales

9 Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 SOUTHERN DIVISION 15 OMAR ROSALES on behalf of Case No. 8:21-cv-00796-JLS-KES himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, [Discovery Document: Referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott] Plaintiffs, 18 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

THE KROGER CO.; and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, Complaint Filed: March 24, 2021 Action Removed: April 28, 2021 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.