Robert Acosta v. Umar Calderon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20222:22-cv-01399California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01399-JGB-PVC Document Filed 03/01/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT ACOSTA, 1:21-cv-01023-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

v. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UMAR CALDERON,

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.