Augusto Lopez v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20222:19-cv-10043California517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-10043-JWH-AGR Document Filed 03/07/ Page 1 of Page ID #:672

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTO L., ) CASE NO. CV 19-10043-JWH (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND vs. ) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s objections, and the Commissioner’s response. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been filed. The Court accepts the Report’s findings and recommendations. The Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) relied on the state agency physician’s opinion that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.