Candice Kaiser v. Equity Residential Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20222:21-cv-10024California5,245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

22 Before the Court are Plaintiff Candice Kaiser’s (“Plaintiff”) “Motion for 23 Remand,” filed on January 14, 2022, and Defendant Equity Residential Management 24 LLC’s (“Defendant Equity”) “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint,” filed on 25 February 2, 2022. (See Dkt. Nos. 11, 13.) The Motions are opposed. (See Dkt. Nos. 26 16-17.) After reading and considering the arguments presented by the parties, the 27 Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing, and VACATES 28 1. Case 2:21-cv-10024-AB-KS Document Filed 03/08/ Page 2 of Page ID #:233

the hearings scheduled for March 11, 2022. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7- 15. Having considered all of the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motions, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Remand and DENIES the Motion to Dismiss as moot, for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint in the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County against Defendants Equity and Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc. on November 18, 2021. (See Not. of Removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.