Thomas Randall v. Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20225:21-cv-01223California2,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01223-JWH-KK Document Filed 03/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:389

J S -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:21-cv-01223-JWH-KKx Date March 21, 2022 Title Thomas Randall v. Automatic Data Processing Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 29] (IN

CHAMBERS)

Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Thomas Randall to remand this action to San Bernardino County Superior Court. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in support and in opposition,2 as well as the arguments of counsel at the hearing on the Motion, the Court orders that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth herein.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.