Rhonda Mills v. Rescare Workforce Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20222:20-cv-10860California6,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-10860-FLA-JPR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:968

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RHONDA MILLS, Case No. 2:20-cv-10860-FLA (JPRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 11] 14 RESCARE WORKFORCE SERVICES, et al., 16 Defendants.

18

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

1 Case 2:20-cv-10860-FLA-JPR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 2 of Page ID #:969

RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Rhonda Mills’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 11. For the reasons set forth below, the court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on September 16, 2020 against Defendants Rescare Workforce Services; Rescare, Inc.; Bright Spring Health Services; Equus Workforce Solutions; Rescare Homecare; Rescare Residential Services; and Rescare California, Inc. Dkt. 1 at 22 (Exhibit A,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.