Andrew S. Kindle v. Bank of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20222:21-cv-06251California1,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06251-ODW-AS Document Filed 03/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

11 ANDREW S. KINDLE, Case № 2:21-cv-06251-ODW (ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND STRIKE [10] AND

14 BANK OF AMERICA, DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE [13]

Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Bank of America (“BOA”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Andrew S. 19 Kindle’s Complaint, or, alternatively, to strike Kindle’s claim for injunctive relief. (See 20 generally Mot. Dismiss & Strike (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 10.) As discussed 21 below, the Court GRANTS BOA’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2021, Kindle brought this action against BOA, alleging violations 24 of Section 615 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681m(f). 25 (Compl. 3, 4.) Kindle alleges that he banked with BOA since 2009,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.