DHS-ICE

Armando A. Marroquin Carpio v. DHS-ICE

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20225:17-cv-02030California1,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:17-cv-02030-DDP-AGR Document 109 Filed 03/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:517

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO A. MARROQUIN, ) NO. EDCV 17-2030-DDP (AGR)

CARPIO, )

) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHIEF COUNSEL, DHS-ICE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge, the objections, the response to the objections, and the records on file. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation in the Report. Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Plaintiff argues that the Report incorrectly categorized him as a “prisoner on civil detention.” (Obj. at 2-3.) On the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.