James Brusca v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20222:21-cv-06347California5,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06347-MEMF-GJS Document Filed 03/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:887

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:21-CV-06347-MEMF-(GJSx) JAMES BRUSCA, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 14, 29] AND GRANTING v. REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [ECF

NO. 19, 30]

14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff James Brusca’s Motion to Remand and his Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 14, 29, 30), as well as Ford’s Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 19). On March 22, 2022, the Court deemed this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing. ECF No. 90; see also C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES the Motion to Remand and GRANTS the Requests for Judicial Notice. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background Plaintiff James Brusca (“Brusca”) alleges that he leased a 2018 Ford Escape vehicle (“the Vehicle”) on or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.