Akeem Rushard Coleman v. James Hill
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20222:22-cv-01897California4,441 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-01897-FLA-KES Document Filed 03/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AKEEM RUSHARD COLEMAN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01897-FLA-KES
Petitioner,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v.
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE
JAMES HILL, Warden, DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY
Respondent.
On March 14, 2022, Akeem Rushard Coleman (“Petitioner”) constructively
filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition” at Dkt. 1.) For reasons discussed more fully below,
the Court orders Petitioner to show cause why the Petition should not be summarily dismissed as untimely. 22
1 Petitioner signed the Petition on March 14, 2022. (Dkt. 1 at 6.) For purposes of this order, the Court assumes, that Petitioner is entitled to the benefit of 25 the prison mailbox rule, under which “a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing . . . .” Campbell…