Akeem Rushard Coleman v. James Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20222:22-cv-01897California4,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01897-FLA-KES Document Filed 03/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AKEEM RUSHARD COLEMAN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01897-FLA-KES

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v.

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

JAMES HILL, Warden, DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY

Respondent.

On March 14, 2022, Akeem Rushard Coleman (“Petitioner”) constructively

filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition” at Dkt. 1.) For reasons discussed more fully below,

the Court orders Petitioner to show cause why the Petition should not be summarily dismissed as untimely. 22

1 Petitioner signed the Petition on March 14, 2022. (Dkt. 1 at 6.) For purposes of this order, the Court assumes, that Petitioner is entitled to the benefit of 25 the prison mailbox rule, under which “a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing . . . .” Campbell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.