Jose Diaz v. Pauline Macareno

Case 2:21-cv-09678-FMO-AFM Document Filed 03/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE DIAZ, et al., ) Case No. CV 21-9678 FMO (AFMx) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE PAUL MACARENO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 Plaintiffs Jose Diaz and Jose Alberto Diaz, Jr. (“plaintiffs”) filed their complaint on December 14, 2021 (Dkt. 1, Complaint). By order dated February 16, 2022, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause, on or before March 15, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiffs’ failure to complete service of the summons and complaint as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 11, Court’s Order of February 16, 2022, at 1). Plaintiff was admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to Show Cause shall result in the action or [] defendant(s) being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with…