Quentin Frazier v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:20-cv-09911California910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-09911-SB-LAL Document Filed 03/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2266

1

4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 QUENTIN JAMAAL FRAZIER, Case No. LACV 20-9911-SB (LAL) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Respondent. 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. In his objections, Petitioner contends that the police violated his constitutional right to due process by failing to conduct a pretrial photographic lineup for one of the witnesses, Cedjanae Walker. The police previously had presented Walker with a number of photographic lineups that did not include Petitioner, and each time Petitioner identified a different individual as the shooter. Petitioner contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.