Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:22-cv-00632California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00632-PA-JEM Document Filed 03/30/ Pagelof1 Page ID He

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIGETTE HUIT, CASE NUMBER

CV22-0632-PA (JEM)

PLAINTIFF(S)

v. FRANK TREVINO, ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

DEFENDANT(S)

IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED.

Date United States Magistrate Judge

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED for the following reason(s): [] Inadequate showing of indigency [] District Court lacks jurisdiction x] Legally and/or factually patently frivolous [] Immunity as to Other:

Comments: Complaint is largely unintelligible. Lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Plaintiff's claims, which include allegations of a widespread conspiracy, are wholly fanciful; she is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984). Recommend immediate dismissal.

2/4/2022 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.