Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:22-cv-00632California247 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-00632-PA-JEM Document Filed 03/30/ Pagelof1 Page ID He
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRIGETTE HUIT, CASE NUMBER
CV22-0632-PA (JEM)
PLAINTIFF(S)
v. FRANK TREVINO, ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
DEFENDANT(S)
IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED.
Date United States Magistrate Judge
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED for the following reason(s): [] Inadequate showing of indigency [] District Court lacks jurisdiction x] Legally and/or factually patently frivolous [] Immunity as to Other:
Comments: Complaint is largely unintelligible. Lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Plaintiff's claims, which include allegations of a widespread conspiracy, are wholly fanciful; she is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984). Recommend immediate dismissal.