David Fink v. Sarkis Ohannessian

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20225:21-cv-05746California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-05746-CAS-RAO Document Filed 04/01/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: EDCV 21-5746 CAS (RAO) Date: April 1, 2022 Title: David Fink v. Sarkis Ohannessian, et al.

Present: The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Donnamarie Luengo N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SECTION 1983

CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On July 9, 2021, Plaintiff David Fink filed a civil rights complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and other federal and state statutes. Dkt. No. 1. In brief, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Sarkis Ohannessian, Chief Deputy Sheriff, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (“SBCSD”); John McMahon, Sheriff, SBCSD; Deputy Vicky Ortiz, SBCSD; Doug Poston, San Bernardino County Deputy District Attorney; Natasha Howard, Deputy Attorney General; Miles Abernathy Kowalski, San Bernardino…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.