Stephen H. Bafford v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20222:18-cv-10219California5,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:18-cv-10219-ODW-E Document 111 Filed 04/04/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2873

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

11 STEPHEN H. BAFFORD, et al., Case № 2:18-cv-10219-ODW (Ex)

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DECLINING v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

AND DISMISSING WITHOUT

NORTHROP GRUMMAN PREJUDICE CLAIMS AGAINST

15 CORPORATION, et al., ALIGHT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT ALIGHT’S MOTION TO Defendants. DISMISS [85] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Stephen H. Bafford, Laura Bafford, and Evelyn L. Wilson bring a 20 putative class action against Defendants Northrop Grumman Corporation; 21 Administrative Committee of the Northrop Grumman Pension Plan; and Alight 22 Solutions LLC for damages arising from miscalculation of Plaintiffs’ retirement 23 benefits. The operative Third Amended Complaint, filed February 22, 2022, sets forth 24 a claim against the Administrative …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.