Manisela V. Prescott v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20222:20-cv-02740California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-02740-SB-SK Document Filed 04/06/ Page 1 of Page ID #:294

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANISELA V. PRESCOTT, Case No. 2:20-cv-02740-SB (SK)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS al., TO DISMISS

Defendants.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to deny in part and grant in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss. Among Defendants, only Officer Magana objects to the recommended disposition since it is adverse to him. (ECF 73 at 2). Plaintiff, too, objects to the recommendations as far as they are adverse to him. (ECF 70). After considering these objections, and reviewing any pertinent records as needed, the Court finds that no objection justifies an outcome on the motions to dismiss different than that recommended by the Magistrate Judge. First, most of the parties’ objections just repeat or reargue the merits of their respective positions from the briefing on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.