George Jones v. Billionaire Burgers Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20222:22-cv-00110California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00110-MEMF-PVC Document Filed 04/06/ Page 1 of Page ID #:185

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-00110-MEMF(PVCx) GEORGE JONES,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS BILLIONAIRE BURGERS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants.

On March 27, 2022, Plaintiff George Jones filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)

against Defendants Billionaire Burgers Inc., Tang Pham, and Kathy Pham asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.; and (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 51–53 et seq. ECF No. 25. The FAC alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, and that the state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.