Matthew Anthony Atilano v. James Robinson
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20225:22-cv-00504California1,753 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-00504-VBF-PVC Document Filed 04/12/ Pagelof5 Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. _ EDCV 22-0504 VBF (PVC) Date: April 12, 2022 Title Matthew Anthony Atilano v. James Robertson, Warden
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS ACTION
BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS UNEXHAUSTED
CLAIMS
On March 10, 2022, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.! (“Petition,” Dkt. No. at 8).? The Petition raises three grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) due to numerous cumulative prejudicial errors at trial, Petitioner’s conviction must be vacated; (2) due to changes in the law regarding youth offenders, Petitioner’s first-degree…