Matthew Anthony Atilano v. James Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20225:22-cv-00504California1,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00504-VBF-PVC Document Filed 04/12/ Pagelof5 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. _ EDCV 22-0504 VBF (PVC) Date: April 12, 2022 Title Matthew Anthony Atilano v. James Robertson, Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS ACTION

BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS UNEXHAUSTED

CLAIMS

On March 10, 2022, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.! (“Petition,” Dkt. No. at 8).? The Petition raises three grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) due to numerous cumulative prejudicial errors at trial, Petitioner’s conviction must be vacated; (2) due to changes in the law regarding youth offenders, Petitioner’s first-degree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.