Eugene St. Amant v. Tracy Turner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
, Case 2:22-cv-02457-SB-E Document9 Filed 04/15/ Pagelof3 Page |ID#:25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
? || EUGENE ST. AMANT, CASE NUMBER: 10 CV 22-2457 SB (Ex) Plaintiff v. 13 || TRACY TURNER, et al.,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT Defendant(s). oweee 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced ina state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 || Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661,…