Mauricio Gonzalez v. East Los Angeles Sheriffs

I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

18 On June 15, 2020, plaintiff Mauricio Gonzalez, who was then in state 19 custody, is proceeding pro se, and has been granted leave to proceed without 20 prepayment of the full filing fee, filed the operative Second Amended Civil Rights 21 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Second Amended Complaint” or 22 “SAC”). (Docket No. 22). 23 The Court, on multiple occasions, has advised plaintiff of his obligation to 24 keep the Court apprised of his correct address and the consequences of his failure to 25 do so. See Notice of Judge Assignment and Reference to a United States 26 Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 3) (advising plaintiff that he is required to notify the 27 Court within five (5) days of any address change, and that if mail directed by the 28 Case 2:19-cv-07867-SVW-JC Document Filed 04/15/ Page 2 of Page ID #:158

Clerk to his address of record is returned undelivered by the Post Office, and if the Court is not timely notified thereafter of his current address, the Court may dismiss the matter for want of prosecution) (citing Local Rule 83-2.5); Initial Order Re: Pro Se Civil Rights Cases (Docket No. 7) (advising…