California Capital Insurance Company v. Enstar Holdings US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20222:20-cv-07806California2,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

18 Plaintiffs California Capital Insurance Company, Eagle West Insurance 19 Company, Monterey Insurance Company, and Nevada Capital Insurance Company 20 allege that in 2012 they entered into a reinsurance agreement (the “Treaty”) with non- 21 party Maiden Reinsurance North America, Inc. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”) Ex. 2 22 (“Compl.”) ¶ 13, ECF No. 1-2.) According to Plaintiffs, Defendants Enstar Holdings 23 US LLC, Enstar US Inc. (d/b/a Enstar Administrators), Cranmore US Inc., and Enstar 24 Group Ltd. acquired Maiden in 2018 and thereafter directed Maiden to breach its 25 obligations under the Treaty. (See generally Compl.) Based on these allegations, 26 Plaintiffs assert claims against Defendants for intentional interference with contractual 27 relations and inducing breach of contract. (See generally id.) Defendants Enstar US 28 Inc. and Cranmore US Inc. (together, “Moving Defendants”) now move to stay this Case 2:20-cv-07806-ODW-JPR Document Filed 04/15/ Page 2 of Page ID #:984

1 case pending the resolution of related case, Cal. Capital Ins. Co., v. Maiden 2 Reinsurance N. Am., Inc., Case No. 2:20-cv-01264-ODW …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.