Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20222:22-cv-02304California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02304-GW-KS Document Filed 04/18/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-2304 GW (KS) Date: April 18, 2022 Title Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: n/a Attorneys Present for Defendant: n/a

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On April 4, 2022, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the “Complaint”). (Dkt. No. 1.) The Complaint is a single page suing Defendant Proland Management concerning a writ of attachment imposed on an asset of Plaintiff’s, as well as Plaintiff having a “low income or Section 8 apartment [application] den[i]ed . . . .” (Id.)

At the outset, the Complaint fails to describe what specific acts on the part of Defendant constituted unconstitutional conduct. The Complaint, therefore, violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.