Joseph Hetzel v. Brian Cates
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Joseph Hetzel (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“section 2254”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. The Petition appears untimely. However, the Court will not make a final determination regarding whether the Petition should be dismissed without giving Petitioner an opportunity to explain why the Petition is not untimely.
II.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 21, 2019, Petitioner pled guilty to violations of Cal. Pen. Code §§ 207(a), 667(a)(1). Id. at 2. Because Petitioner entered into a plea bargain, he did not appeal the conviction. Id. at 3.
Petitioner indicates he filed a habeas petition in Santa Barbara County Superior Court on March 2, 2021. Id. A case search on the California Courts Appellate Courts Case Information website confirms that: (1) on July 8, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeal, which the court denied on Ju;y 27, 2021; and (2) on August 18, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the California Supreme Court, which the court denied on…