Camden USA, Inc. v. Christopher Jenkins
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-02549-DSF-GJS Document Filed 04/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
JS-6 2 3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Camden USA,
CASE NUMBER:
10 2:22-cv-02549-DSF-GJS Plaintiff v. Christopher Jenkins
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” 21 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v.…