Antonio Fernandez v. Victor Hugo Torres Palencia

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20222:22-cv-02327California647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02327-MEMF-PVC Document Filed 04/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-02327-MEMF(PVCx) ANTONIO FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS VICTOR HUGO TORRES PALENCIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

On April 7, 2022, Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez filed a Complaint against Defendants Victor

Hugo Torres Palencia, Noemi Fuentefria, and Miriam Hernandez, asserting: (1) a claim for damages and injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213; and (2) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 51-52 et seq. ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.